This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

nuclear weapons head

Then, this is a bit of a touchy question. From the beginning, even before the true destructive and killing power of The Flop was clear to its own creators, one thing was certain: Nobody should ever learn nuclear weapons if those whopractice accept them tin can help information technology. That may be a hypocritical stance for current nuclear powers to take — but they'relive hypocrites, so any.

The justified fear over nuclear technology led to the creation of ane of the weirder bits of legislation: the classification of "built-in secret." This refers to the fact that, under a sure reading of the police, information on the pattern and function of nuclear weapons is considered stolen classified information fifty-fifty if yous come up up with it yourself.

Equally a result of this and more reasonable secrecy plans, the fine details of all but the earliest nuclear weapons are all the same unknown to the public. To be fair, those details wouldn't assistance anyone but a state actor, one with access to nuclear material, enrichment facilities, tons of money, and at least a few world-class engineers, but it'southward still probably for the all-time. So rather than learning how to actually build nuclear weapons (darn…), we'll have to settle for a basic conceptual understanding of the two basic nuclear weapon types: the quondam, and the new.

Fat Man, the bomb which was detonated over Nagasaki. Shirts probably wouldn't have helped anyway...

Fat Man, the flop which was detonated over Nagasaki. Shirts probably wouldn't have helped anyway…

The former type of nuclear weapons, still in use all over the world, are chosen fission bombs, or but diminutive weapons. The latter term tin can be used every bit an umbrella, or to specifically refer to the start sort of bombs created during the Second Globe State of war. Scientists load the bomb with a "super-disquisitional mass" of enriched fissile textile, normally uranium, which can create a self-sustaining concatenation reaction of fission events. Though information technology's created differently, this is basically the same chain reaction that occurs in a nuclear reactor, but more than uncontrollably due to the amount and enrichment (isotope purity) of the sample used.

The ups and downs of this classical nuke-blazon are well known. The explosions are big, the fallout horrifying. Even hardened military men, who did not glimmer at the idea of wiping whole sections of world cities from beingness, were taken aback by the continuing bear upon of radioactivity. This radioactive decay comes from various sources, but much similar the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, the majority of the long-term damage comes from how the explosion physically distributes radioactive textile over a wide radius. This material comes from the bomb itself, and if detonated virtually the surface (not high in the air) the reaction will also vaporize and disperse a huge amount of footing and/or water as a highly radioactive (mushroom) cloud. Traces of the fallout from some such explosions tin be detected by scientific instruments all over the earth.

nuclear weapons 4

The other type of nuclear weapon is called a thermonuclear weapon, or sometimes ahydrogen flop. Westhile no nuclear weapon could e'er exist said to be humanitarian, if there ever is a nuclear war between corking powers, we'll exist happy they have these, rather than the old kind. "Hydrogen bomb" gets the indicate beyond: The primary destructive sample is not uranium or plutonium or even thorium, but heavy isotopes of the most abundant chemical element in the universe. And rather than breaking these atoms apart, thermonuclear weapons generate their outward force through the process of nuclear fusion.

nuclear weapons 3Thermonuclear weapons basically contain a conventional nuclear weapon, only much smaller than its overall yield would seem to require. The power of this small fission reaction is directed onto two on-board samples of hydrogen isotopes — ane deuterium, the other tritium — and these samples are forced together so violently that they fuse. Once again, the main difference betwixt the fusion going on hither and in a fusion reactor (beyond that we had to explode a bomb to get it started) is that a bomb has many tens of thousands of times more fusion textile.

Now, doing fusionalso releases a ton of radiation, but this release is short-lived compared with the radioactive half-life of textile strewn around afterward a fission explosion. So, by eliminating the vast majority of the fissile material in the bomb, distributing this sample around the surround via a fusion explosion has a much less toxic outcome. Thermonuclear weapons can deliver a much college yield than pure fission bombs, but they crucially produce less fallout while doing so. They are likewise more natural fits equally so-chosen "tactical nukes," assuasive targeted destruction of an installation without having to make the whole area uninhabitable for a while.

Other types of nukes include neutron bombs, which intentionally let high-intensity neutron radiation out of the bomb's case. While most bombs have a thick case of lead or some other textile to finish the release of neutron radiations, neutron bombs are designed to be as thin and permeable as possible. They were specifically invented to counter the thick shielding on Soviet tanks, which was thought to provide too much protection against pure heat and concussion, simply they're too sometimes idea of as pure anti-personnel weapons, since neutron radiation tin be extremely deadly to biological fabric without destroying infrastructure.

At that place'due south likewise a concept called a salted bomb, which encases the nuclear device in a metal like gilded that tin can be neutron-blasted into a much more radioactive isotope, producing a huge additional amount of radioactive material upon detonation. The concept was named for the phrase "table salt the Earth;" thankfully, so far as we know no salted bomb has ever actually been tested.

None of these are to be confused with dirty bombs, which are the real threat posed when low-tech groups like terrorists come into nuclear material. Rather than creating an actual nuclear flop, they would only strap aregularexplosive device to a sample of radioactive material and blow it up. This cannot cause a nuclear reaction, but information technology can contaminate large areas by distributing an aerosol version of the radioactive substance. The destructive power isn't very bully, but the loss of life could withal be substantial due to health problems in the years and decades after the explosion.

Check out our ExtremeTech Explains series for more than in-depth coverage of today'due south hottest tech topics.